Don’t know if they are doing the same thing with V1. But for V2, I remember the 62g and 65g have 14mm short springs, while their 67g and 78g have 16mm long springs.
1 Like
I like 65 g 14mm springs, but that’s not an option here.
67 G long is a bit heavy if that’s what’s it’s going to be. Might go with 62 G even though I’m not sure I’ve ever completely liked a 62 G V1! We’ll probably end up spring-swapping anyway.
1 Like
yep, their stock springs arent that great anyway
1 Like
Funny enough I saw today on Instagram that they’re re-releasing V1s. Surprisingly the housing is going to be opaque.
edit: aaaaand I should have checked their actual page: Zealio® V1 Redux Switches - Zeal Generation Inc.
2 Likes
Yeah, custom nameplates is simply not a thing Gateron offers to anybody at the moment, according to multiple people who have tried (including Zeal).
3 Likes
So mine just arrived - here are my thoughts:
First impressions
62 G
Still has a lot of that insectile sound, but the new housing makes itself heard. It’s a bit deeper and flatter than recordings of the old V1, even stock. It is a high-pitched chittery sound even compared to something like Gateron CAP Milky Brown, though.
These aren’t lubed much from the factory. Clearly intended to be user-lubed. I would say that they are underlubed, if using Gateron CAP for comparison. They actually feel a bit scratchy, and you can distinctly feel the entire process of the tactile leg. You can feel it catching if operating the switch slowly, kind of like Ergo Clears that haven’t had much lube.
If coming from today’s heavy tactiles like HP and Bobas, you might mistake Zealio V1 62 G for Browns. But they are not. Stock Zealio V1 redux feels more tactile than lubed Durock Medium Tactile, such as Mode Signals. I would say that these ‘62 G’ springs are pretty light for the size of the tactile bump, kinda borderline.
It’s a small, crispy bump that isn’t as ‘rounded’ as MX Brown or CAP Brown. It’s definitely a less ‘chill’ switch than Browns are. It’s a ‘sharper Brown.’ It has a more abrupt tactility.
I would definitely want to lube these, gonna try 3204 eventually. I also wouldn’t want to run these on a metal plate. I’m testing on a Tester68 board with GMK, and it’s a bit harsh as you are likely to bottom-out. I think these would be better on an MK870 with polycarb plate, or even a plateless Cherry-style build such as NCR-80.
67 G
These are noticeably heavier than the 62 G. Not as smooth as the 67 G Zealio V1 original that I remember from meetups. But those were carefully hand-lubed.
The 67 G feel much more directly-comparable to Durock Medium Tactile. 62 G Zealio V1 redux feels lighter, in terms of spring-weight, than 63.5 G DMT. The 67 G Zealio V1R feels maybe a bit heavier than DMT in terms of spring. Tactile bump intensity of 67 G Zealio V1R is comparable to DMT, but you would have to closely line up a bunch of switches and carefully test them to suss out the differences.
Conclusion
The bump is comparable to Durock Medium Tactile, but spring weight is a little different. Factory lube is very light, given the size of the tactile bump, which is larger than Brown. Probably a little more intense than Gateron CAP Brown, and definitely less-rounded.
You might call this a “light-medium” tactile, and one that should be lubed. Definitely more intense than Brown-style switches, it is a kind of light Ergo Clear. I remember building some Gateron Orange stems inside Boba housings with 60 G L TX springs that kinda remind me of these. I actually think 16mm springs might be beneficial for function with these, since the lighter springs need more weight at the top. I have yet to try that.
There’s some crunch-noise or plunger-noise from the springs and/or central housings in operation, it seems, at least unlubed.
3 Likes
Oh man, i hate bad sounding tactiles 
Yeah, you could mod these and get better results, but I’m almost past that now. We’ve seen quite a few recent switches that are getting very close to being able to just use as stock. This feels like a step back.
1 Like
I didn’t want to say this, but yes, the classic Zealio design / production is being overtaken by other switches that don’t need much, if any modding.
I knew what I was getting into with the Zealio V1. I didn’t enjoy the stock sound in the past, and didn’t think I would this time around. The springs don’t seem to be as bad as in the past, so that’s good. Although they probably could use improvement.
Wobble seems to have been successfully reduced from early revisions. I’d be surprised if these housings needed filming. And the new housing material is probably better than in the past, so there has been improvement.
The problem, as you note, is that other manufacturers have been improving this whole time, and 2020-2021 brought us some very slick new switches. So now I would say Zealio has to catch up in several respects, although it is doing so.
The value proposition of Zealio V1 redux over something like Gateron CAP Brown is somewhat questionable. CAP Brown is nearly as tactile, and sounds better out-of-the-box. OTOH if you don’t like the way CAP Brown is lubed, or you don’t like the one sound it offers, you’re kind of in trouble. The Zealio V1R is going to be easier to mod.
So Zealio V1R offers modders probably more flexibility than many pre-built light-tactiles. Might end up being easier to mod these to one’s preference. Although I’m not sure if Zealio V1R are worth the premium over Durock Light Tactile. But Zealio V1R may operate successfully through a wider range of springs, much like Durock Light Tactile. I honestly think DMT is a bit limited in terms of what you can do.
One thing I suspect is that Zealio V1R, like many of the new wave light/medium tactiles, is just going to sound and feel better on polycarb / POM plates, unlike how Cherry Brown / Clear works fine on alum or plateless and doesn’t seem to benefit as much from certain exotic plate materials.
2 Likes
As I mentioned earlier, I think these switches are meant to be lubed.
So I will lube some Zealio V1 redux, and get back to you later as to how they are. These switches are likely intended for modders, who will customize them somewhat.
OK, so I just lubed 2 of the ‘62 G’ Zealio V1 redux switches.
I’ve been lubing Ergo Clears recently, so I gave these a similar treatment. I lubed the housing rails and stem contact surfaces [tried to avoid the legs] with 3204 and springs with a spring mixture.
It’s definitely softer in feel now, and the lube helps with overcoming the tactile bump. The more I use these V1Rs, the more I think that the ‘62 G’ spring-weight is a little marginal for the size of the tactile bump. OTOH I find the 67 G relatively heavy, and I’m really thinking that it may have been useful to offer a ‘65 G’ Zealio V1 of intermediate weight here.
My preference is the lubed switches, but they are less snappy and poppy than stock. You have to be really careful here, since the stems are smooth, and the tactile bump isn’t large. Sound-wise, the lubed switches are thackier and more muted, whereas the stock are chittery and have more ‘interior’ noise. I suspect that the springs are a major contribution to any undesired sound, and are a prime candidate for replacement.
I’m sure, over time, we’ll find out what the best spring weights are for these switches, as well as what the designed measurements really equate to.
These aren’t Browns, they are much closer to light Ergo Clears. I build some samples of Ergo Clears with 62 G (S) 14mm TX springs recently, and these give me a similar vibe.
When lubing, the switches came apart fairly easily, but the housings were still pretty tight. Inside, they appear to be very clean and orderly. They look very uniform and spotless. There’s some lingering noise when operating stock switches, so there are likely things happening with the leaf and springs. I’ll have to lube a 67 G later, and see if it’s possible to replicate that ice-on-ice smoothness and rich tactile shape that the old, hand-lubed V1s could create. More interesting results will probably come from using TX springs and such.
2 Likes
Thanks for posting your thoughts on the Zealio V1 redux switches. I was on the fence but these switches really don’t seem like something I’d enjoy, so I saved some money for once!
2 Likes
I’m glad my information was helpful, but they are just initial impressions. These are the switches that helped create the custom market we have today, so are deserving of a deeper look.
I honestly think that these succeed at providing a kind of ‘factory Ergo Clear,’ although I have doubts about the stock weights and lube-level. They definitely offer something different from Browns. But it’s former niche is now relatively crowded.
Oh, definitely. I’m not disparaging them at all, but I’ve skewed pretty far over to the heavy tactile side of things in my preferences.
1 Like
My initial impressions of the Zealio V1 redux may seem a little critical, but it still is a fairly-pleasant switch to use, once lubed.
People not into keyboards seem to like the lubed Zealio V1, it’s decent enough. Just forced to compete against improvements in other switches.
You have to lube these more carefully than Ergo Clears, I think. Tactile legs may be more sensitive to lube.
The question I’d be interested in having answered is, what are some ideal light springs for V1 redux? We all suspect that Gateron’s springs are not premium. Also, what is a good lube? 3204 may be too thick, if you are unwieldy with the brush (get gud).
1 Like
I lightly lubed mine also with 3204 but on the stem and spring only and it came out pretty okay. It feels just as smooth as the stock lubed JWK medium tactile switches but with slightly less noise coming from the leaf contact point (leaf to leaf).
Lubing ergo clear is definitely a lot more forgiving, even with 205g0. The tactile bump from my lubed zealios v1 62g is just tiny bit less sharp compared to my ergo clear built with 63.5g spirit springs + lightly lubed stem&bottom housing with 205g0. It’s also more clacky when bottom out as well but not as high pitch as the JWK medium tactile switches. Nothing beats deep muted sound from Cherry’s housing.
5 Likes
Great first post!
Yes, those sound like real Ergo Clears. 63.5 G Spirit and all.
Cherry’s sound is hard to beat. I selected Ergo Clears for an NCR-80 build. 63.5 G Progressive Spirit [they hit like 55 G springs].
I recently read that some people are carefully lubing the Zealio V1 redux with 205g0. It still makes they “raindrops” sound they were looking for. I’ll have to try that at some point, as I’m not using 205g0 for anything else.
I’ll try your lubing method with 3204, along with some replacement springs. Maybe starting with 60 G TX 14mm. I still think the stock 62 G Zealio V1R weight is a little low for the size of the tactile bump. Need a ‘63.5’ G Zealio V1 or something.
I have been reading all the topics related to ergo clear like switches. Just didn’t get a chance to share my 0.002 cent until I got the zealios v1 redux. 
Yea! Spirit’s non progressive 63.5g turns ergo clear into a pleasant/snappy medium tactile switch with pre-travel. I’m not sure if it’s because of the spring force curve or the leaf. My mode signal’s with its stock 63.5g isn’t as snappy and tactile compared to the ergo clears. I will try if the zealios v1 redux can replicate the same snappy feeling using the same spirit spring.
I will also give 205g0 a try. Probably need a realllly thin coat otherwise it might be too viscous for the stem to slight up and down on rails (of course no lube on stem legs).
1 Like
Interesting. I agree that 63.5g makes it fairly snappy.
In fact, it’s my understanding that one of the main motivations behind 63.5 G was they wanted a spring in the ‘sweet-spot’ between 62 and 65 G specifically for Ergo Clears.
It’s not really 63.5 G by measurement, but somewhere in between those 2 Spirit springs.
Anyway, I really like that weight for OUTEMU Silent Sky stems inside Cherry [MX Clear] housings. It’s really poppy and rich with that spring weight. [Silent Sky is meant to be an Ergo Clear]. The 62 G TX 14mm is another spring good for making light Ergo Clears, 62 being a classic weight for them, and previously seen as the minimum you can get away with unlubed.
What I’m trying to say here is that Ergo Clears in particular seem to be highly sensitive to spring weight in terms of the experience you get with them. Just try 63.5 G Progressive vs 68 G Progressive, for example. 62 G 14mm is sharp and poppy, but not wildly so, 65 G is firm and reliable, only slightly fatiguing. 60 G + lube turns it into a kind of empty, characterless Brown, but 55 G and minimal lube gives you a crunchy switch.
Zealio V1 also seems to be pretty sensitive to weight, but so was V2 for that matter. You can use 205g0 on Ergo Clears, BTW, my 65 G are like that. If you are careful, then you get the full tactile bump and full travel, but a softer bottom-out.
Also, yeah, Mode Signals and Durock Medium Tactile can feel kind of ‘dead’ with the stock Durock springs, when compared to the lively Ergo Clears.
I don’t like the bump shape so much. It’s kinda there, like a small T1, and then once you clear it you just slam down to the bottom. Not very ergonomic, if you ask me.
I have 68 Mode Signals with stock springs, filmed and lubed with 3203. They’re actually pretty nice, but sound and feel kinda plasticy with Cherry-profile. With MG Profile, they’re awesome, though. The heavy MG keycaps make the switches almost as light as Browns, but they’re obviously smoother and less-scratchy. And more sturdy. So I’m thinking of filling-out a 65% with them. They still slam down though. Like most Durock tactiles, needs a polycarb plate instead of metal.
I also have a full 106 RARA V2 switches. They’re also Durock Medium Tactile, but use overpowered ThiccThock springs. Now this is a crazy DMT on steroids. They are very poppy and resistant in terms of spring weight, these are like 63.5 G Long springs, and deep-sounding. They’re sturdy, very little wobble, and low-pitched with MG-profile keycaps. They function like you’d expect some 1970s mainframe terminal keyboard, with authoritative presses and none of that Cherry wobble and scratch.
Got a chance to do a couple experiments today.
Lubing with 205g0 works on these Zealios v1 Redux. Just a light sheen of 205g0 on stem is sufficient and will perform just the same as 3204. The housing and the stem is so much smoother compared to cherry. We just can’t fix Cherry’s sandy housing and stem with 205g0. lol.
I also did one with 205g0 + Spirit’s 63.5g spring and was able to replicated the tactility of the 63.5g ergo clears but with a smooth travel. No scratchy/sandy key press. However, the leaf spring pings whenever the stem legs move pass the bump. Got the same pinging noise from my zilent v2 too.
I think I would just lube the rest of my switches with 3204 on the stem only and bag lube the springs with 105g0/106g0. I might need to dab some lube on the back of the leaf but this is just too much hassle. 
I think I got most of the Durock medium tactile variant except RARA v2 and OPGrey. I totally agree with you on that. To me, Zealios V1 is the closest replica to the ergo clear in terms of tactile bump and pre-travel but with smooth housing and stem and leaf pings. I really wish Durock adds a little bit more pre-travel to the medium tactile stem. This will for sure turns Twilights into a really good ergo clear with smooth key press and no leaf ping. (high-pitched bottom out can be some what fixed with PC/POM plate).
1 Like