When Skiidata popped up, I started to seriously consider the keycap club. My thinking went like this; if I buy four keysets a year, the membership pays for itself - and let’s be honest - I buy at least four sets a year from them between my own love of MT3 and my customers’ love of their in-stock colorways.
It’s soo cooool… it also matches my bright orange NK65… They really do have an almost constant flow of new MT3 sets, almost all of which I think look great and that I want in my collection. I already have certifiably too many MT3 sets, and looking in my heart-of-hearts, I have no intention of stopping.
So, heck it, Keycap Club here I come.
I’m about to go on a mild rant here but before I do I’ll say that thinking is still basically true and the membership has plenty of potential to be totally worth it - IF you go about it in a certain way. It’s not a rant about the program itself, which I actually think is fine, so much as a rant about specific language used on some of their pages.
There is some pretty misleading language on the sales pages - only down in the FAQ is there real clarity - at least for an ADHD habitual skimmer like myself.
Each keycap listing has the language,
Drop Keycap Club Members save a minimum of $20 on this item with their annual membership.
On the FAQ page it details that the “$20 minimum” does not apply to “this item” so much as include “this item” if it’s part of an order that meets some basic conditions - the discount applies to the whole order together. So - if you buy three keycap sets that all say “$20 minimum on this item” you’ll get $5 off two of them and $10 off another. Not a bad deal - but not exactly what it says on the item pages, either.
The discount includes artisan caps, too, which is cool - but that’s another potentially misleading situation; say someone wants a $35 artisan, and sees the language “…save a minimum of $20 on this item…” with the $100 minimum not mentioned anywhere on that page or any other between it and payment unless the user specifically side-steps to the FAQ page.
It’s the words “minimum” and “this item” being in the same sentence together and without any qualifiers that’s rubbing me the wrong way here.
Don’t get me wrong - I don’t think the actual way it works is a bad deal at all, especially for someone that buys as many keycaps as I do. I’m happy with the membership and what I expect to get out of it now that I’m caught-up with how it works - but hoo boy does that language on the cap listings strike me as intentionally misleading.
I want to like you, Drop, but all too often I walk away from an interaction feeling like I’ve just dealt with an Amway down-liner moonlighting as a used car salesman. You know - with lots of gold jewelry and/or wiry chest hair poking up from an unbuttoned collar.
Hey. Want some Holy Pandas™, kid? They’re epp-ick.
Crazy idea - a little less priority for the lawyers, a little more for writers that actually like the products?
IMHO, this information should be at the bottom of any page that mentions the deal - or hey, crazy thought - maybe just clearly worded in the first place. Like, I dunno:
With their annual membership, Drop Keycap Club Members save a minimum of $20 per month, once per month on any single keycap order over $100.
or even
With their annual membership, Drop Keycap Club Members receive one coupon every month with a minimum value of $20 for any order of keycaps of $100 or more.
Yes, it’s less immediately attractive - but it’s also accurate and totally avoids that uncessarily bad feeling a customer can get when they feel they’ve been purposefully mislead by technically, legally true language. It’s also not unattractive. Had I read that language, it would have been a simple calculus for me to jump on-board and be totally happy about it.
Now I’m just kinda happy about it, but I also feel kinda myeh and yucky about it. 
Y U LIEK DIS DORP