Would You Use a Magnetic, Modular Mechanical Keyboard? Looking for Feedback!

I’m working on a fully modular mechanical keyboard concept and would love to hear what you think! The idea is to create a keyboard that adapts to different needs by using magnetically attachable parts, so users can customize their layout however they want.

Key Features:

:white_check_mark: Modular & Magnetic Design – Attach/detach numpad, arrow keys, and macro keys as needed.
:white_check_mark: Bluetooth & Wired Support – Works wirelessly or via USB-C.
:white_check_mark: Hot-Swappable Switches – Users can customize switches easily.
:white_check_mark: RGB & Small OLED Screen – Shows battery, time, and volume (with a sliding volume control).
:white_check_mark: Multi-Platform Support – Compatible with Windows, Mac, Linux, and gaming consoles.
:white_check_mark: Driver-Free Installation – Works out of the box without extra software.
:white_check_mark: Waterproof & Durable – Built to last and handle accidental spills.

Potential Add-Ons:

  • Micropad with a touchscreen to switch layers.
  • Detachable drawing tablet module for artists.
  • DJ pad module for music/media control.
  • Integrated touchpad for extra control.
  • Wrist rest with built-in magnet attachment.

I’d Love Your Feedback On:

:one: Would you be interested in a modular keyboard like this? Why or why not?
:two: What features do you like or dislike? Anything you’d change?
:three: What price range would you expect for something like this?
:four: Are there any deal-breakers that would stop you from buying it?

This is still in the concept phase, so I really appreciate any thoughts, critiques, or suggestions! Thanks for reading, and I’m looking forward to your feedback. :raised_hands:

3 Likes

My main reason I don’t like this isn’t aimed at your project in particular, but every project that doesn’t use standard parts, but aims for modularity.

Users become dependent on a single source for non-standardized parts, which actually makes the product less serviceable and modular.

2 Likes

Interest:

I have at least one friend who has been interested in a pre-made product like this for years, and has even purchased an early iteration in the form of the ASUS Claymore V1, only to be disappointed by its clunky connection, software, and build quality. He’s also considered the Everest Max, but so far hasn’t found enough value in the package to spring for it. I’ve also shown them the occasional interest-check for high-end custom approaches to the modular theme with full-aluminum cases and magnetic pogo-pin connectors, but the relatively high price of entry compared to other options they’d seen scared them off.

I think that users like my friend would be interested in this project as long as the magnetic connection were consistently strong and reliable (not weak or fiddly), if any software was easy to use or at least standardized (say, VIA), and if the modularity were truly smooth in-practice - and of course, if they found the price reasonable. More on that below.

Functionality:

I said it would be important for modularity to be truly smooth in-practice. That is, does each part need its own wire, or can they communicate to each-other to allow for only a single cable / bluetooth transmitter to be used at a time? (Likewise can each module work on its own?) I think that if this could be developed into a smooth and seamless experience it would go a long way. Part of the Claymore’s problem was A.) it’s super thick and chunky main cable and B.) its fiddly, awkward connectors that were simultaneously large and flimsy. If the modules actually talked to each-other either wirlessly or with some kind of magnetic pogo-pin setup, that would be preferable to each module just being their own separate device that simply sticks together physically.

Software / Plug-and-play:

Plug-and-play is both good and generally preferable - though the capacity for features like remapping and macros is probably important to many users who would consider a board system like this. I’m imagining programmers, IT professionals, or creatives who game in their free time. At my old job, I’d have loved to be able to pull a numpad out of my drawer and slap it onto the side of my 65% without using another cable or bluetooth connection, and to be able to pull it off and put it back in the drawer just as easily when I’m done entering strings of numbers.

Price:

Price I would expect to pay would really depend on the construction and features. I also think that people like my friend who would be shopping for an experience like this would be less concerned with luxury materials than with general reliability and ease of use. They’ll want a good looking keyboard that gives an impression of quality, but I don’t think it will need an all-metal construction or fancy materials like brass, milled polycarbonate, or carbon fiber. A robust and durable plastic shell would be fine, as long as it’s truly robust and durable.

The kinds of customers that I’d imagine would respond to this kind of modular setup will likely see the value in a premium product family, but may also be scared-away by traditional custom keyboard prices. Under $200 for a main / core alphanumeric module would be a must for customers like these, preferably under $150 to compete with products from companies like Logitech, Steelseries, ASUS, and Razer while offering more flexibility than they can. If you could get small modules like numpads around $50 (at least as addonds, maybe a little more on their own) I think that would be attractive, especially if they work both on their own and seamlessly with the modular system.

2 Likes

Hey,

Thanks for the detailed feedback! This is exactly the kind of insight I was hoping for.

  • Hidden Magnetic Connection & Modularity: I completely agree that the connection needs to feel seamless and reliable—not clunky or fiddly. My plan is to use strong, hidden magnetic pogo-pin connectors so that modules snap together smoothly without visible magnets or bulky connectors. The goal is for it to look like a single, solid keyboard when assembled.
  • Wireless / Wired Communication: My goal is to allow modules to communicate with each other wirelessly (or via pogo pins if attached physically) while maintaining a single connection to the computer. Each module would also work independently when detached. Would this be something your friend would find useful?
  • Software & Plug-and-Play: I agree that users will want easy remapping and macros. I’m considering using VIA/QMK for deep customization while keeping plug-and-play as the default. Would VIA compatibility meet your needs, or do you think a built-in software-free remap system is better?
  • Pricing: Your pricing breakdown makes a lot of sense. I want this to be affordable yet high-quality, so a robust plastic build (instead of all-metal) might be the best way to balance cost and durability. Keeping the main module under $200, ideally $150, and add-ons around $50-$80 sounds like a solid target.

Would your friend be interested in something like this if it hit the right price and execution? Also, what’s your opinion on additional modules like a touchpad, DJ pad, wrist support, drawing tablet module (similar to Wacom) or a micropad with a touchscreen for layer switching?

1 Like

That’s a great point, and I want to make sure my keyboard is actually modular and repairable, not just tied to my own ecosystem.

I plan to:

  • Use standard MX switches & keycaps, so users can swap them easily.
  • Use Bluetooth for detachable parts, making it more compatible.
  • Allow users to buy spare parts separately or even 3D-print certain pieces.

Does that sound like a step in the right direction?

1 Like

Yes, I think so.

I think VIA is a lot more beginner-friendly than on-board remapping like older Ducky models had. Not needing software has its appeal but the process is slow and clunky. VIA is comparatively fast and effortless, as long as the board works with it out of the box.

I think so. I know I would be if I still worked a desk job.

I think most of these sound like good or at least decent ideas; the only one I’m not sure about is the drawing tablet as most illustrators I know prefer to set up their tablet positioning either in a certain position on their desk, or hold it in their hands away from their desk. I definitely think an optional attaching wrist support is a good idea.

1 Like

Really appreciate your continued feedback! It’s super helpful in refining this concept.

• Independent Modules → Glad to hear that’s something your friend (and others) would find useful. My goal is to let each module function as a standalone device when detached, while also working seamlessly when attached to the main keyboard.

Now that the idea is getting more refined, Im curious: If I were to actually make this keyboard, do you think there would be enough interest for people to buy it?
Also, are there any features or details that would make this keyboard a must-buy for you or your friend?

Thanks again! This kind of feedback is exactly what I need to make sure this product is actually useful and well-executed. :+1:

I can’t really speak for anyone, but I’d be happy to share my thought process.

The friend I mentioned has been talking about wanting a good modular keyboard for years, so I think at very least he and folks like him would be genuinely interested.

I’ve also noted that ASUS sold enough of the V1 Claymores to make a V2, so that’s something. It’s also true that the Everest keyboard made it into production after a Kickstarter campaign - so I do think there’s real interest for this kind of format - and the more convenient it is to use, the better.

I think one more thing to think about is how big the core module should be. I do think it should generally follow the standard format shape, and I think the most approachable core size would be TKL. Personally I’d love a 65% core option, but I also think that would be less popular - so maybe that could be an alternate option down the line once the system is out.

I’m not sure there’s any silver bullet here so much as a confluence of features that would push it over the line, and I think we’ve covered those; if the price is right alongside seamless ease of use and a robust design, I personally think you’d have a winner on your hands. The modular format has been approached a handful of times in keyboard space, but I’ve yet to see a single project that nails the price-convenience-robustness trifecta.

1 Like

If this isn’t the case, then I apologize in advance, but this feels a lot like prompting an AI.

I do use AI a little bit to help make my responses clearer

Hey

It’s really encouraging to hear that your friend (and others) have been actively looking for a good modular keyboard for years. Seeing ASUS release a Claymore V2 and the Everest keyboard succeed through Kickstarter definitely reinforces that there’s a market for this.

• Core Module Size → I totally get what you’re saying about the TKL format being the most approachable. I love 65% keyboards myself, but I agree that TKL would have broader appeal as the base module. Maybe 65% could come later as an alternative option.

I’ve been trying to gather more opinions from different forums and Reddit communities, but unfortunately, I haven’t gotten many responses. Since you seem to have a good grasp of what people might be looking for in a modular keyboard, do you have any suggestions on where I could reach more people who might be interested?

Also, if you know anyone who might have thoughts on this, I’d love to hear their input too! No pressure at all, but any help in getting more feedback would mean a lot.

Again, I really appreciate your help, it’s helping me shape this into something truly worthwhile!

Honesty, I don’t know a better place than KeebTalk - there are other forums, but like you I’ve found them to be less helpful and welcoming.

Once your project is further along in conceptual development you might consider GeekHack, but like Reddit you can expect a lot of cynicism and toxicity there alongside any potentially helpful feedback.

You might try looking around for other dedicated forums for “makers” to get feedback and advice - or even for folks that might belong to potential target audiences for your product like programmers, writers, data-entry specialists, etc. - but it’s hard to say how much useful feedback you’d get from those places.

I’m far from a market research expert, but it may be worth looking into that specifically - how you might go about assembling a virtual / remote focus group for feedback, for example.

1 Like

I’m not sure if im really part of the target audience for something like that, though I do like the pogo-pin approach.

If I would go down that route, I would have some hard requirements, unless I would absolutely be out

  • Bluetooth connection between modules, means batteries to keep charged and sounds like a huge pain with QMK, I would really prefer pogo-pins there
  • QMK and wireless almost instantly feels like the current license violating Tri-Mode PCBs, so QMK with published source files is an absolute must
  • Documented standard of the connection between modules, in the best case with something like KiCad files to support community driven Addons
  • Preferably also CAD/STEP files to work for community modules

So basically really an open approach on that. Proprietary firmware/hardware is almost an instant nogo for me these days, especially if you need some kind of software that nobody knows how long/how well it will be supported and most times also missing Linux support completely. So if wired, open QMK with source files, wireless the same just for ZMK.

2 Likes

The kbdcraft Adams with that numpad connected through a weird JST-like cable:
Some solder kits with swappable microcontrollers:
(Just realized I replied to the wrong person, my fault.)

The painfully tedious hand wire boards with the single switch mini pcbs (those look like a pain to work with).

2 Likes

Yeah thanks, I’ll check that out.

Do you think it’d be a good idea if I made my own firmware/hardware?

No. That’s bad for both you and potential consumers. Contribute to already existing widely adopted projects like QMK or ZMK. Just be mindful of licensing.

2 Likes

From my personal point, absolutely not. Would be a direct nogo for me. QMK/ZMK with proper licensing or I’m out personally. There are definitely more than enough people who don’t care (otherwise the Tri-Mode 6x% boards would not be that successful), but the community of the hobby is the biggest point for me.

2 Likes

First render of my custom keyboard! Only the keyboard itself for now, no modules and no color yet. Looking for feedback! What do you think?


1 Like

From my experience in the community, a prototype is a physical first unit. This image appears to be a render. We usually call this a “render” or concept art. Nitpicking, but an important thing to know if you’re going to ask for feedback.

The layout is unique with the function row being lined up with the number row. I’ve seen it on a few boards but it’s atypical. I kinda like it.

The knob seems small. Did you have a part in mind? I’ve not seen custom that small. Although, I would like to see them.

2 Likes